At the request of an Ilikai owner (who is also a full-time resident at the Ilikai), I am posting their letter, please see below.
“Olga,
I completely agree with you assessment of the current board. I am not at all comfortable with the fact that most of the people at the front of the room during board meetings [OLGA: this refers to the Board Directors] either are or were products of the second floor rental office [OLGA: this refers to Marina Hawaii Vacations, a rental and sales company owned by the Tokioka Family]. And if not directly involved with that office, they are indirectly involved in that they rent their condos through that office. In effect they have formed a close knit club among themselves and slant their decisions to favor their agenda rather than the interests of us, individual owners. Furthermore, please explain to me why certain individuals who neither live in the Ilikai nor own anything in the Ilikai are on our board of directors supposedly representing us, owners [OLGA: this refers to Dass Ramadass who is an employee of the Tokiokas' companies that own one unit at the Ilikai (or several at most if under different names). Dass Ramadass is a Board Director, but he does not own anything at the Ilikai. How can he act in undivided loyalty to the AOAO and owners if he is not an owner here? Isn't his loyalty instead directed to his employer, the Tokiokas' companies?]. I would suggest they would be better suited being on the board of directors of the building or neighborhood in which they live rather than on the board of the building in which I live.
Concerning the upcoming board elections, Hawaii First in their mailings to us did not even tell us how many seats are up for reelection (they should go too). I believe you pointed out that 7 of the 9 seats are up for election, so it is a big and important election. The present board is, of course, doing everything possible to acquire proxies in order to keep themselves in power, however, in my opinion a number of them should go. It is also my opinion that I-Star should, as they own a large portion of the Ilikai, have representation on the board. They are Steve Stinson and Lesley Love. The only other candidates that I know of (other than the current board) are you Olga Geling , Robert Humphreys (a recently retired attorney) and Cheryl Van Law (a relatively new and very qualified (real estate) arrival). I would suggest to undecided voters to give these five applicants serious consideration. To be voted off the board are (in my opinion) Dass Ramadass, Lea Sasak, Robert Currie and others of your choosing.
For a better Ilikai,
Robert Vogtritter”
P.S. Olga’s comment: I certainly agree with what Mr. Vogtritter has to say. With one exception – regarding the Board candidate Cheryl Van Law. I certainly agree with Cheryl on many issues, most notably regarding the assessment of the current Board as a total major roadblock to any progress here. This Board had a whole year to prove themselves, but they failed, dismal record. But I disagree with Cheryl on several key issues. For ex., Cheryl has been advocating for letting Shell and timeshare stay here and making statements to the effect that timeshare is legal here. These statements of hers are totally off-base and do NOT correspond to what our covenants and applicable law and law cases say.
