<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: On the subject of consolidating vote proxies</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ilikaiowners.com/2010/01/28/on-the-subject-of-consolidating-vote-proxies/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ilikaiowners.com/2010/01/28/on-the-subject-of-consolidating-vote-proxies/</link>
	<description>Ilikai news, updates &#38; information</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 19 Sep 2011 21:37:26 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: nancy mueting</title>
		<link>http://www.ilikaiowners.com/2010/01/28/on-the-subject-of-consolidating-vote-proxies/comment-page-1/#comment-505</link>
		<dc:creator>nancy mueting</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Jan 2010 21:35:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ilikaiowners.com/?p=362#comment-505</guid>
		<description>Dear Olga,
Thank you for allowing freedom of speech on your website.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dear Olga,<br />
Thank you for allowing freedom of speech on your website.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nancy mueting</title>
		<link>http://www.ilikaiowners.com/2010/01/28/on-the-subject-of-consolidating-vote-proxies/comment-page-1/#comment-504</link>
		<dc:creator>nancy mueting</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Jan 2010 21:29:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ilikaiowners.com/?p=362#comment-504</guid>
		<description>In many ways Olga is defragmenting the goals of the 
independent owners by supporting I-star.  It would be
in their interest to hault strategic mesures in place 
by our incumbant board:

1)  Time-share lawsuit 
2)  Fair representation on the board   
3)  Common area survey verification    

Collectively we sacrificed countless hours  providing service to our our gone- astray  property.  It is critical now that we maintain 
solidarity in proxy collection to make achievements.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In many ways Olga is defragmenting the goals of the<br />
independent owners by supporting I-star.  It would be<br />
in their interest to hault strategic mesures in place<br />
by our incumbant board:</p>
<p>1)  Time-share lawsuit<br />
2)  Fair representation on the board<br />
3)  Common area survey verification    </p>
<p>Collectively we sacrificed countless hours  providing service to our our gone- astray  property.  It is critical now that we maintain<br />
solidarity in proxy collection to make achievements.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hans D Puehse</title>
		<link>http://www.ilikaiowners.com/2010/01/28/on-the-subject-of-consolidating-vote-proxies/comment-page-1/#comment-495</link>
		<dc:creator>Hans D Puehse</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jan 2010 18:52:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ilikaiowners.com/?p=362#comment-495</guid>
		<description>Responding to &quot;Somebody was trying to talk me into partnering with the OBC group.  That would be exactly the way to lose owner votes, because many owners do not want to be part of that group and their mentality, way of conducting business, and so forth&quot;: It was I who attempted to persuade Olga to align herself with other owners on the board so that she would have a chance to help shape the future of the Ilikai. Unfortunately, Olga has decided to go it alone or worse, partner with iStar. Remember, iStar is an owner in the Ilikai not by choice but rather they were left holding the bag when Anderson defaulted.  iStar&#039;s interest is finding a way to unload what they &quot;inherited&quot; after making the bad business decision to lend money to Anekona. If elected to the board, iStar will spend AOAO funds that help them dispose of the property,  which may not be in the best interest of Ilikai owners.  I apologize for having  entrusted Ms. Geling with the maintenance of the ilikaiowners.com website and frankly, I am disappointed to see what  it is being used for now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Responding to &#8220;Somebody was trying to talk me into partnering with the OBC group.  That would be exactly the way to lose owner votes, because many owners do not want to be part of that group and their mentality, way of conducting business, and so forth&#8221;: It was I who attempted to persuade Olga to align herself with other owners on the board so that she would have a chance to help shape the future of the Ilikai. Unfortunately, Olga has decided to go it alone or worse, partner with iStar. Remember, iStar is an owner in the Ilikai not by choice but rather they were left holding the bag when Anderson defaulted.  iStar&#8217;s interest is finding a way to unload what they &#8220;inherited&#8221; after making the bad business decision to lend money to Anekona. If elected to the board, iStar will spend AOAO funds that help them dispose of the property,  which may not be in the best interest of Ilikai owners.  I apologize for having  entrusted Ms. Geling with the maintenance of the ilikaiowners.com website and frankly, I am disappointed to see what  it is being used for now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

