Archive for 2009

Another example of hotel to condodel conversion fiasco

Sunday, December 20th, 2009

This is a really interesting article.  The Wall Street Journal of Dec. 9, 2009 reports on another ill-conceived and ill-fated hotel to condotel conversion project.  This is a project called Hotel 71, located in Chicago.  The firm that purchased the property announced that they are ditching the condotel conversion plans and will operate the property as a traditional hotel instead.

The article goes on to say: “The history and sale of Hotel 71 shines additional light on the busted business model of condo-hotels, which typically allows unit owners to rent rooms when they aren’t using them.  At the peak of the real-estate boom, many small investors snapped up condo-hotel units.  But the economic collapse, which has hit the hotel and condo markets the hardest of any commercial-property class, naturally hasn’t been kind to the hybrid property type.  Canyon plans to complete the renovation Mr. Falor started but has no intention of pursuing his condo-hotel strategy.  Rather, the property will be operated as a traditional hotel, according to people familiar with the deal.”

AS A REMINDER: The Ilikai is NOT a condotel.  Instead the Ilikai is a mixed-use property that combines condominiums and traditional hotel under the same roof in the same complex.  Mixed-use is a different model that the “condotel,” also called “condo hotel,” model.  Anekona had ideas to convert our hotel into a condotel.  We all know the resulting fiasco.  Let’s all learn from this.  I am saying this because apparently there are still some individuals who are nursing condotel conversion ideas – with personal agendas in mind.  The Ilikai has been a mixed-use property combining private condominiums and a traditional hotel in one property since Chinn Ho built it this way.  Leave it that way.  Many of us have purchased our units precisely because of this mix-use nature, with the traditional hotel.  We did not buy into some condotel or timeshare joint.

Pictures of our Christmas decorated Ilikai

Saturday, December 12th, 2009

Well, it’s Holidays season!  As customarily around this time, our Ilikai got now all decorated for Christmas and New Year.  It looks so beautiful!  Thanks to resident owners who took the time to help decorating!  Here are some pictures of our Christmas decorated Ilikai, courtesy of the AOAO office.

Liquor Commission Chief is placed on leave (not Ilikai news)

Friday, December 11th, 2009

This is not Ilikai news.  But a few of us had ongoing experience with the Liquor Commission when trying to get them investigate the loud noise from the Hilton luau.  You may recall that a few Ilikai residents reported the noise to the Liquor Commission. It was an eye-opener process.  Pacific Business News reports that the Liquor Commission Chief is placed on leave.  Take a look at this Star Bulletin article, it provides more detail.

On the definition of timeshare, difference from hotels etc

Tuesday, December 8th, 2009

There are so much misinformation and myths circulating around here.  Let me separate one such myth from reality.  There two main types of timeshare: deeded and not deeded.  Hawaii Revised Statutes HRS § 514E provides the Hawaii timeshare law and defines those, see the definitions below.  The timeshare by Shell Vacations Club (“Shell”) here at the Ilikai is not deeded.  That is, Shell owns their 123 units.  What they sell is points for the right to use.  Take a look at the definitions below.  Shell’s timeshare falls into the (2) category in the HRS § 514E-1 timeshare definitions. 

Please note that the fact that Shell’s timeshare is not deeded could be considered good news.  Why?  Because Shell holds the deed to those units.  This should make it easier for them to get out of here.  If it were deeded timeshare, it would be way more involved for them to cease their operations, because there would be circa 52 deeded timeshare owners per unit.  Just imagine that!

Speaking of which, as I reported earlier, an Ilikai affiliated entity is looking into setting up deeded timeshare here.  This is not a rumor, it is from a reliable external source, I have more detail.  With the current lawsuit against Shell, there is not much they can do.

I am writing this because I keep hearing from some owners this mythic claim that Shell’s timeshare is “points-based,” and thus, supposedly, it is not really timeshare but more like a hotel, and thus, Shell’s operations are legal.  Hello!  This is absurd logic.  What’s worse is that these owners allege that they hear this type of interpretation from certain Board Directors.

Almost all of timeshare is points-based these days.  Deeded or not deeded – almost all timeshare plans these days are points-based.  That’s the timeshare norm these days.  I encourage you folks to attend a timeshare presentation.  I have been to a few, it is very educational.

Back to the HRS § 514E-1 timeshare definitions: Pursuant to HRS § 514E-1,

“”Time share plan” means any plan or program in which the use, occupancy, or possession of one or more time share units circulates among various persons for less than a sixty day period in any year, for any occupant.  The term time share plan shall include both time share ownership plans and time share use plans, as follows:

(1) “Time share ownership plan” means any arrangement whether by tenancy in common, sale, deed or by other means, whereby the purchaser receives an ownership interest and the right to use the property for a specific or discernible period by temporal division.

(2) “Time share use plan” means any arrangement, excluding normal hotel operations, whether by membership agreement, lease, rental agreement, license, use agreement, security or other means, whereby the purchaser receives a right to use accommodations or facilities, or both, in a time share unit for a specific or discernible period by temporal division, but does not receive an ownership interest.

“Time share unit” means the actual and promised accommodations, and related facilities, which are the subject of a time share plan” (emphasis added).

Note that HRS § 514E-1 clearly states, “excluding normal hotel operations.”  I.e., the Hawaii timeshare law itself clearly differentiates between “normal hotel operations” and “timeshare.”  Timeshare is also taxed very differently than hotels, among other differences.

As a reminder, here is what the Ilikai covenants (Declaration and Bylaws) say about permitted uses of Ilikai apartments:

  1. Pursuant to Section 7(a) of the Ilikai Declaration, “[t]he owner of each apartment within the building shall use such apartment only as living accommodations for hotel or apartment purposes” (emphasis added).
  2. Pursuant to Article VI Section 1(a) of the Ilikai By-Laws, “[t]he owner of each apartment within the building shall use such apartment only as living accommodations for hotel or apartment purposes” (emphasis added).

Now compare that with the timeshare definitions in HRS § 514E-1.  HRS § 514E-1 clearly states, “excluding normal hotel operations.”  The Hawaii timeshare law, HRS § 514E, itself clearly differentiates between “normal hotel operations” and “timeshare.”  How can anyone argue that Shell’s timeshare operations are same as hotel and thus should be allowed here?!  Why is our Board of Directors refusing to cite and fine Shell for violations for using their units for timeshare purposes even though the Ilikai Declaration and By-Laws only permit hotel and apartment uses?

Wall Street Journal reports on financial problems of the Timeshare industry

Tuesday, December 8th, 2009

Here is a Wall Street Journal article of July 8, 2009, “Hotels Sound the Alarm on Time Share.”   Take a moment to read the article and please note what it says there about a timeshare company, Consolidated Resorts, Inc.  I have more about that company – a sad story of a condominium project conversion into timeshare by Consolidated and what happened to that project.  Let’s hope the Ilikai does not follow that path.

Here are some quotes from the article (emphasis added): “The hotel industry has been reeling for the past year amid a steep decline in business and leisure travel. Now it is moving away from one of its former profit centers: time shares.  Major time-share developers, led by Wyndham Worldwide Inc., Marriott International Inc., Starwood Hotels & Resorts Inc. and others, are scaling back their time-share business as investors in time-share loans demand higher interest rates, buyers become more scarce and resales of time shares put downward pressure on prices and demand for new units. …

The pullback will reshape some large time-share players. Wyndham, which owns 150 resorts globally and counts 830,000 time-share owners, intends to whittle its time-share business by 40% this year to an annual sales rate of $1.2 billion. That is a big reduction for Wyndham as a whole; its time-share division provided 53% of Wyndham’s revenue last year and 42% of earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization.  …

[time-share trouble]

The cutbacks made by Wyndham and others are aimed at remaking their time-share divisions into “a much smaller business”

The problems came to a head late last month for a Las Vegas time-share developer when the company, Consolidated Resorts Inc., said it would file for bankruptcy protection. …

Analysts say the giant hotel companies aren’t in danger, but the decline in the time-share business will be a drag on profits for years. …”

Anyway, take a moment to read the whole article and note Consolidated Resorts, Inc., I have more about them – that should ring the alarm for us at the Ilikai.

Why is our Board of Directors still refusing to cite Shell for running their timeshare operations at the Ilikai, even though the Ilikai Declaration and Bylaws only permit hotel and apartment use?  Why are they allowing Shell to run their timeshare sales here?

Delinquencies

Saturday, December 5th, 2009

Richard Emery (of Hawaii First, a property management company retained by the Ilikai AOAO to provide financial management services) stated on several occasions that the Ilikai delinquencies are now in excess of $1,490,000, of which circa $1,260,000 are Anekona delinquencies.  At a Board meeting at the end of October, I asked Richard Emery whether these figures included legal fees.  Mr. Emery explained that indeed, these figures include various fees related to efforts that were supposed to help collect those delinquencies.  For ex., Lyle Hosoda was contracted by the AOAO at the end of 2008 specifically to focus on collection of Anekona delinquencies.  At the October 2009 meeting, Richard Emery quoted $125K-$135K as the amount of fees to Lyle Hosoda.  He also added that those total dollar amounts may include some of the legal fees to Chris Goodwin, the AOAO’s ex legal counsel.  When I asked how much of the Anekona delinquencies have been collected so far, the answer was $0. 

By the way, how did Lyle Hosoda get here?  Lyle Hosoda was recommended by Richard Emery.  Some of the current Board Directors, incl. Bob Romo and Lea Sasak, sided with Richard and were heavily pushing for contracting with Lyle Hosoda.  Anekona was removed from the Board in February 2009, i.e., almost a year ago.  The owners’-controlled Board has been officially in control since early March 2009.

Bundling the dollar amounts for the delinquencies and various fees is not particularly informative and could be misleading.  Therefore, I sent a letter to the Board and Richard Emery to request (a) to break down those bundled dollar amounts to show the amount of delinquencies and various fees, and (b) to request a status report on the collection efforts, incl. what the Board has done, is doing, and planning to do to collect, and how much they are envisioning to collect.  Here is the letter.  I did get a quick reply from Mr. Emery.  He wrote that “it is up to the Board to respond,” and that Hawaii First did not get paid extra for efforts to collect delinquencies.

I’d like to add that collecting delinquencies is not as hopeless as some individuals are trying to present. – It depends whom and how you go after.

Star-Bulletin 11/28/2009: “Colliers to be broker for Ilikai Shops”

Saturday, November 28th, 2009

Star-Bulletin of 11/28/2009 reports: “The Ilikai Hotel has selected Colliers Monroe Friedlander as the leasing broker for the Ilikai Shops, which includes restaurant, retail and office space, according to iStar Financial’s affiliate, SFI Ilikai Retail Owner LLC.

Hotel Management Services LLC has been managing the 203-unit Ilikai Hotel and Suites since late July with a variety of support services from Aqua Hotels and Resorts. In addition, Elite Parking has been selected as the Ilikai’s parking operator.

The Colliers team will be led by Jessika Fodor and Emalia Pietsch, who specialize in retail leasing, and Susan Ichimasa, who specializes in office leasing.”

“It is not the people who vote that count; it is the people who count the votes.”

Wednesday, November 25th, 2009

The above statement was supposedly made by Joseph Stalin.  I don’t know whether Joseph Stalin actually said it, but that’s not the point. 

As you may or may not realize, most of the Ilikai Board of Directors will be up for re-election at the upcoming Annual Meeting in March.  According to our count, seven of the nine Board Director positions will be up for re-election (six for sure, I am not certain about one).

By the way, based on experience in other condominiums associations, you’d be surprised how easy it is to rig such elections.  Associations with lots of absentee owners appear to be particularly prone to abuse.  E.g., most condominium associations ask owners to mail in their proxies even if they plan to attend the meeting, for quorum purposes.  But, say, certain disinterested absentee owners are known to be unlikely to show up at the meeting and bother to delegate their proxies.  Do you think it is difficult to rig those proxies?  Here is an example from a condominium association in Las Vegas, that even got the FBI involved.  When you open that link, click on the video located on the right to watch a Las Vegas TV recording about this corruption probe of condominium associations.

Re Edition Hotel to be opened at Yacht Harbor Tower

Wednesday, November 25th, 2009

Here is a media report on the Edition Hotel to be opened at the adjacent Yacht Harbor Tower.  (For those not familiar with its history, Yacht Harbor Tower was developed by the Ilikai’s original developer, Chinn Ho, as an annex to the Ilikai.)  The Morimoto restaurant is expected to be located in the area where the wedding chapel used to be, fronting the ocean.  They are also planning to add a VIP Pool with Sky Bar.  Those are to be located on the upper deck adjacent to the Ilikai tower.  It is really exciting that we will have this as our neighbors, something to look forward to.  With that said, man, they still have problems to solve.  The fact that they still do not have their liquor license is just one.  But there are also questions whether or not certain county requirements have been fulfilled.  Often, in these situations, it just takes some unhappy third-party contestant to derail things.

On the subject of doors

Wednesday, November 25th, 2009

This is in response to an owner who is having concerns and questions about his doors – apartment door and lanai doors – and also who is responsible for maintaining those, the owner or the AOAO.  He wrote, “I am totally confused and do not know what to do regarding the peeling laminate on my door.”  Come on, folks, that is easy.  I wish other things at the Ilikai were that straightforward and easy :)   I am posting this here in case others have similar questions.  Parenthetically, I am realizing more and more just how much I have learned over the last year and a half or so, about the Ilikai, but also condominiums, real property etc. 

To begin with, anyone with this type of questions should check the Ilikai governing documents.  The Ilikai Declaration, Bylaws and House Rules form the foundation.  Don’t just rely on what somebody else “thinks,” because there is plenty of incompetence and ignorance around here.  Also, contact the AOAO office, specifically, the AOAO manager, John Popovich.  That’s the starting point.

Back to the doors.  The AOAO is responsible for maintaining the exterior of the apartment door, whereas the owner is responsible for the interior of the door.  The AOAO budget each year allocates circa $10K-$16K to replace doors.  That is because doors wear out, get damaged etc, but not at the same rate.  So the AOAO replaces the most damaged doors each year.  There have been some changes over the years in terms of who (AOAO or owner) pays how much.  If I recall it correctly, the AOAO pays for the whole door these days (but I am not 100% sure, I don’t have plans to replace my door, so I did not pay full attention when this was discussed recently). 

Please also keep in mind that whenever the AOAO replaces your door, they would make sure that the new door has locks that are compliant with the House Rules.  Quite a few apartments have non-complying locks.  They are considered “grandfathered.”  But if you are getting a new door, it must have compliant locks.

Several months ago, under the previous President of the Board, Charles Carroll, the Board looked into changing the type of oak used.  There is red oak and there is white oak.  I always get confused which one is which.  The bottom line is that the AOAO used to have one type of oak, but several months ago the Board voted to switch to this other type of oak.  The new oak of choice (red or white – as said, I mix them up) costs significantly less, but actually looks more appealing.  It looks somewhat different.  Charles Carroll pointed out that the new type was more attractive and costs less.  He happens to have lots of experience with various oak doors, based on his professional experience.  I agree with him on that, but it’s personal preference, of course.  The AOAO office had a sample door stored.  I don’t know if they still have that sample door there or if they’ve installed it at some apartment.  Related to that: Since they are now using these lower priced doors (which happen to look nicer), the same amount allocated in the AOAO budget allows for more doors to be replaced per year.

This particular owner who was inquiring was reporting that his door has peeling laminate on the outside.  What should the owner do?  The owner should contact the AOAO office, specifically, the AOAO manager, John Popovich, to report the problem.  The AOAO office decides which doors to replace in a given year.  

Regarding the lanai sliding doors: The apartment owner owns the whole area from the lanai railing inwards, incl. the lanai doors.  Thus, the maintenance of the lanai doors is the responsibility of the owner.  The AOAO has nothing to do with it. – Except, of course, the fact that the Ilikai governing documents delineate the type of doors and glass to be used, for uniform appearance.